Last week, Spain’s government approved a draft tobacco law that never once mentions cannabis, yet could dismantle the everyday activity of the country’s thriving cannabis social clubs.
On July 21, 2026 the Council of Ministers signed off a bill overhauling Law 28/2005, which governs smoking laws, and sent it to the Congreso de los Diputados.
Among provisions covering smoking and vaping in public areas like beaches and bar terraces, the text removes the private smokers’-club exemption that has long been used to justify on-site consumption, bringing so-called ‘herbal products for smoking’ under the same regime as tobacco.
According to figures cited in a recently published report from cannabicultor.com, there were between 800 and 1,000 cannabis social clubs operating in Spain at the sector’s late-2010s peak, making it the largest such network in Europe.
With these clubs already operating on narrow and often contested legal ground, removal of the cover they have relied on for on-site consumption would threaten the very reason so many Spaniards become members.
The hidden threat
Spain’s cannabis social clubs have never had a dedicated legal framework of their own. Instead, they have relied on a combination of legal provisions to shield them.
First is the criminal-law doctrine of ‘shared consumption’, under which a closed group of adults cultivating and sharing cannabis among themselves can fall outside trafficking law.
The second, quieter support sits inside tobacco legislation Law 28/2005. Implemented in a 2010 reform, it contains a provision that exempts legally constituted private smokers’ clubs from the indoor smoking ban if it happens on their own private premises and only members are present.
That second provision has now been removed entirely. In its explanatory memorandum, the bill explicitly states the removal of ‘the special exemption that private smokers’ clubs have enjoyed’.
Beyond the removal of this exemption, the same bill extends the smoke-free rules and product controls to ‘herbal products used for smoking, vaping or inhaling’, a category that plainly captures cannabis without naming it directly.
READ MORE…
As such, not only is smoking inside a private cannabis club now banned, but ‘herbal products’ are now part of the same regime as tobacco, meaning the act of smoking in any shared indoor space falls under the smoke-free rules written for cigarettes, regardless of what the shared-consumption doctrine still says about growing and sharing.
The government has framed the reform, justifiably, around public health. Health Minister Mónica García, who has championed Spain’s long-delayed medical cannabis framework since taking office, described smoking as ‘the leading avoidable risk factor’.
Presenting the bill, she noted that tobacco causes 50,000 deaths a year in Spain, and projected annual health savings of between €100m and €200m.
Ministry briefings and mainstream media coverage focused almost solely on the headline changes, including a ban on smoking on beaches or terraces, a ban on consumption by under-18s, and sales of vapes confined to specialist shops. The removal of the private-club exemption appeared as a single line in coverage dominated by images of sunbathers and e-cigarettes.
Enrique Dorta, who handles press for cannabicultor.com, a cultivation-sector outlet which has recently published a report on Spanish social clubs, told Business of Cannabis the bill is ‘more important than the sector has so far publicly acknowledged’.
When he canvassed several club owners, he says, none realised the law would touch them at all, most read it as a rule about smoking in public.
“That gap in awareness is itself part of the problem,” Dorta said.
‘Structural incoherence’
Cannabicultor’s report argues that the last missing piece of basic normalisation is Article 36.16 of Organic Law 4/2015, the citizen-security statute known as the ‘Ley Mordaza’.
Currently, consuming and growing cannabis within your home incurs no sanction, but under this act carrying even a small amount of cannabis in public can incur fines of €601 and €30,000.
He notes that this new tobacco bill mirrors the ‘same structural incoherence’ as above: “The tobacco bill risks further eroding the already fragile legal cover that clubs have used for collective consumption, while the 36.16 issue continues to punish the individual consumer on the street.”
According to the clubs’ confederation, ConFAC, drug users accounted for 74% of all ‘Ley Mordaza’ sanctions in 2023, generating more than €130m for the state, a figure that excludes Catalonia and Navarra.
A reform of Article 36.16 is already before Congress, agreed between EH Bildu and the governing partners, which would downgrade public possession to a minor infraction with a €100 minimum.
Built on uncertain ground
For Spain’s cannabis social club community, threats of crackdowns are nothing new. In a paper published in the International Journal of Drug Policy in February 2026, researchers from the University of Granada trace the clubs’ rise and decline through nearly 300 court rulings.
Contentious Legality in Decentralized Governance summarises the movement as ‘a temporary institutional compromise’, one shaped by court battles rather than top-down legislation.
Spain’s clubs had existed unofficially for far longer, but the model expanded rapidly in the early 2010s. Catalonia registered 72 new clubs in 2012 and 164 in 2013, by which point the region held 268 in total, more than 100 of them in Barcelona, with combined annual revenues estimated at around €60m. Registrations peaked the following year, with a further 227 in 2014.
Inevitably, this drew the attention of the state. From late 2015 the Supreme Court issued a run of restrictive rulings that narrowed ‘shared consumption’ almost out of existence. Regional attempts to legislate a way through, in Navarra and Catalonia, were struck down by the Constitutional Court in 2017 and 2018.
Ultimately, it shows that every previous existential threat to Spain’s already legally contentious social club movement, have come via court rulings.
The tobacco bill, conversely, would curtail them through national legislation. It is a statute that applies uniformly and on a fixed date, without the case-by-case ambiguity that has let clubs keep operating for years.
The Ministry of Health expects passage before the legislature ends, meaning the law would take effect 20 days after publication in the Boletín Oficial del Estado, with a two-month grace period for signage.
