SUMMIT European Cannabis Insights Summit 2026 — Exclusive industry intelligence Register Now
EVENT Cannabis Europa London 2026 — Europe's cannabis industry unites Get Tickets

Recent Searches

    Odor of Burnt Cannabis ‘Insufficient to Provide Probable Cause for Vehicle Search’, Illinois Supreme Court Rules

    By

    An Illinois Supreme Court decision has ruled that the smell of burnt cannabis is ‘insufficient to provide probable cause for a police officer to search a vehicle without a warrant’.

    The landmark decision upheld previous rulings from the lower courts, citing major changes to state law regarding cannabis that have altered how its use should be treated by law enforcement.

    Since 2020, adult-use cannabis consumption has been legal in Illinois, but those driving must keep their cannabis in odor-proof containers.

    This stipulation was a key element of the initial case, People vs. Redmond, in which Ryan Redmond was pulled over while traveling from Des Moines to his home in Chicago on a stretch of road police described as a ‘known drug corridor’.

    State Trooper Hayden Combs pulled Redmond over for minor traffic violations, before conducting an unwarranted search of his vehicle based on the odor of burnt cannabis.

    Once inside the vehicle, Redmond was found to have  one gram of cannabis in a plastic bag in the vehicle’s center console, leading to a charge of unlawful possession, citing his failure to transport his cannabis in an odor-proof container.

    During the original 2020 court case, Combs conceded that Redmond showed no signs of impairment and that there was no evidence of cannabis buring inside the car.

    Combs testimony that he had searched the car because of an odor of burnt cannabis was challenged by Redmond in lower courts, which ruled in his favour.

    On Thurday September 19, the Justice P. Scott Neville Jr., writing for the court, stated that the smell of burnt cannabis could no longer serve as standalone probable cause for searches, particularly in a legal environment where cannabis use and possession are permitted under certain guidelines.

    “We also hold that the totality of the facts and circumstances known to Officer Combs did not provide probable cause to search Redmond’s vehicle,” the ruling said.

    “The laws on cannabis have changed in such a drastic way as to render the smell of burnt cannabis, standing alone, insufficient to provide probable cause for a police officer to search a vehicle without a warrant.”

    Ben Stevens

    Ben is the editor of Business of Cannabis. Since 2021, he has researched, written, and published the vast majority of the outlet’s content, delivering agenda-setting journalism on regulation, business strategy, and policy across Europe.

    The Briefing / Newsletter

    Insights
    you don't want
    to miss.

    A comprehensive, thoughtfully curated overview of the stories defining today's cannabis sector — breaking news, investigative features, expert commentary, and context-rich analysis to help you navigate events with clarity and confidence.

    • Policy & regulation
    • Markets & deals
    • Clinical & science
    Subscribe free